Hi Prog; i did download the Android version of ProgDVB for IPTV but i find that Perfect player is much better,the sound on ProgDVB is too low compared to PP, everytime i change from Perfect player to ProgDVB i have to turn up the sound in the tv which is annoying , also channels get blacked out often with just sound asking for codecs ,also it takes some time too long for some channel to appear,.Also pic on Android is too dark,.
My suggestion to you;why don't you make an Android ProgDVB at least same Quality as PP and charge a fee like you do for PC,but please make it as good or better than PP?.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#3Hi Prog; today i decided to download the Beta version and i find it much better,i was using the one that is in the google play,will see
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#4Total same. But again, ProgTV have many modes of playback. And every device have self requests.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#5Prog; do you mean android Prog DVB from Playstore is the same of ProgDVB BETA?.
Sorry to say but still think Android Prog DVB is not near yet as good as Perfect player.Perfect player we don't have to change any decoder it uses Auto: Aims to find the most suitable decoder for a given stream/file.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#699% same. But again. You can try different modes of players. Result is total different.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#7ivtec, with ProgTV you need to have some knowledge of what you're doing in order to tweak the settings for different links. PP works for people that chew gum ProgTV works for people that want to chew gum and blow bubbles at the same time. If you're not willing to put in the time to learn how to use ProgTV then you're missing out on a player that clearly is way better than PP.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#8stan; why should i have more Knowledge for Prog DVB for IPTV Android TV box?Stan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:37 amivtec, with ProgTV you need to have some knowledge of what you're doing in order to tweak the settings for different links. PP works for people that chew gum ProgTV works for people that want to chew gum and blow bubbles at the same time. If you're not willing to put in the time to learn how to use ProgTV then you're missing out on a player that clearly is way better than PP.
with Perfect Player it's so simple a cave man can do it and still continue to say Perfect player is whole lot better and simple and efficient then Progdvb for android,it's my opinion and ProgDVB is the one that has to deny my negative opinion .
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#10Prog. please for IPTV M3U just make it auto so it searches for the right codec, just like in PP, just make one application similar to perfect player or better will pay for it.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#11ivtec wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:27 pmstan; why should i have more Knowledge for Prog DVB for IPTV Android TV box?Stan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:37 amivtec, with ProgTV you need to have some knowledge of what you're doing in order to tweak the settings for different links. PP works for people that chew gum ProgTV works for people that want to chew gum and blow bubbles at the same time. If you're not willing to put in the time to learn how to use ProgTV then you're missing out on a player that clearly is way better than PP.
with Perfect Player it's so simple a cave man can do it and still continue to say Perfect player is whole lot better and simple and efficient then Progdvb for android,it's my opinion and ProgDVB is the one that has to deny my negative opinion .
ivtec, that's like saying you know how to start a car but you have no clue of how to get to your destination. I use ProgTV on android it will play links PP can't play. If you're happy being a caveman and not willing to expand the knowledge base of your brain then you are the one who misses the point.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#12On some devices and some channels better ProgTV one some PP. But this is not important. Important information about real problems. Real tests...
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#13STAN BRO JUST HAVE TO SAY TO YOUR RESPONSE TO ME ,DON'T BE AN ASS.Stan wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:50 pmivtec wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:27 pmstan; why should i have more Knowledge for Prog DVB for IPTV Android TV box?Stan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:37 amivtec, with ProgTV you need to have some knowledge of what you're doing in order to tweak the settings for different links. PP works for people that chew gum ProgTV works for people that want to chew gum and blow bubbles at the same time. If you're not willing to put in the time to learn how to use ProgTV then you're missing out on a player that clearly is way better than PP.
with Perfect Player it's so simple a cave man can do it and still continue to say Perfect player is whole lot better and simple and efficient then Progdvb for android,it's my opinion and ProgDVB is the one that has to deny my negative opinion .
ivtec, that's like saying you know how to start a car but you have no clue of how to get to your destination. I use ProgTV on android it will play links PP can't play. If you're happy being a caveman and not willing to expand the knowledge base of your brain then you are the one who misses the point.
Re: Making Android better for IPTV?
#14Stupidity's not a crime, so you're free to go.ivtec wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:44 pmSTAN BRO JUST HAVE TO SAY TO YOUR RESPONSE TO ME ,DON'T BE AN ASS.Stan wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:50 pmivtec wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:27 pm
stan; why should i have more Knowledge for Prog DVB for IPTV Android TV box?
with Perfect Player it's so simple a cave man can do it and still continue to say Perfect player is whole lot better and simple and efficient then Progdvb for android,it's my opinion and ProgDVB is the one that has to deny my negative opinion .
ivtec, that's like saying you know how to start a car but you have no clue of how to get to your destination. I use ProgTV on android it will play links PP can't play. If you're happy being a caveman and not willing to expand the knowledge base of your brain then you are the one who misses the point.