Hi, Prog, i have scanning problems with the last versions. When i scan a satellite, it looks repetead frequencies, but with the other polarity. For example I want 4000,H, 27000 but it scan this and 4000,V, 27000 which is not present in my frequencies list.
Then, scan saves many wrong channels (H or V) not present in satellite.
I see that the NIT search is doing bad things, too, as many times scan ends with repeated chanels, but with small diference frequencies (2-3 MHZ). Couldn´t scanner be more smart, or turned off and dont save these repeated? I find it is worst with poor signals.
What to do, so?
Re: Scanning problems
#3Yes, think it would be nice feature, for poor signal satellites scan.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Re: Scanning problems
#4If NIT frequencies differ from the transponder list database, that lists should better be corrected by the author.
Perhaps a minimum spacing between transponders might be implemented with the software, below of which the closest existing value would be used, instead of assuming a new transponder. Same symbol rate and FEC used would be good additional criteria, to avoid errors.
What is the minimum possible distance between active SCPC DVB signals (on the same polarisation), perhaps 2 MHz?
Less than that should be within AFT range anyway...
If NIT frequencies differ from transponders found on a blind scan, the LOF(s) used should be corrected by the user, to tune to the true centre frequency as close as possible and get the best possible lock.
Perhaps a minimum spacing between transponders might be implemented with the software, below of which the closest existing value would be used, instead of assuming a new transponder. Same symbol rate and FEC used would be good additional criteria, to avoid errors.
What is the minimum possible distance between active SCPC DVB signals (on the same polarisation), perhaps 2 MHz?
Less than that should be within AFT range anyway...
If NIT frequencies differ from transponders found on a blind scan, the LOF(s) used should be corrected by the user, to tune to the true centre frequency as close as possible and get the best possible lock.
My signature:
Please read here:
On Bug Reports And Other Complaints
and there:
BOARD RULES - READ THIS!
I don't give support by e-mail or PM.
And I will never assist on PayTV hacking.
PM ME FOR THIS AND YOUR ACCOUNT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY, WITHOUT ANY WARNING!!!
NEVER EVER DARE TO CONTACT ME FOR PRO VERSION ISSUES!
I am not responsible for that.
Check the 'Activation' section.
Please keep it in English here, or Russian in the Russian section, or German in the German section.
I don't read nor write Klingonian or any other language than English and German.
Addressing me personally in any exotic language will be treated as severe insulting! Be warned!!!
1.)AMD Phenom II x4 940, GA-MA770-UD3, 8 GB DDR2-6400. 7 Pro SP1 x64 + XP Pro SP3 x86
DVB-S2: Cynergy S2 USB HD
2.)P4 3200 i865G (F-S Scenic W600pwr) XP Pro SP3
DVB-S: hauppauge WinTV Nexus-S rev. 2.2, driver TT 2.19h, hardware mode
19.2°,13°,28.x°E,30°W, DiSEqC 1.0
Auf Deutsch:
DVB-Cube <<< Das deutsche DVB-Forum >>>
Please read here:
On Bug Reports And Other Complaints
and there:
BOARD RULES - READ THIS!
I don't give support by e-mail or PM.
And I will never assist on PayTV hacking.
PM ME FOR THIS AND YOUR ACCOUNT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY, WITHOUT ANY WARNING!!!
NEVER EVER DARE TO CONTACT ME FOR PRO VERSION ISSUES!
I am not responsible for that.
Check the 'Activation' section.
Please keep it in English here, or Russian in the Russian section, or German in the German section.
I don't read nor write Klingonian or any other language than English and German.
Addressing me personally in any exotic language will be treated as severe insulting! Be warned!!!
1.)AMD Phenom II x4 940, GA-MA770-UD3, 8 GB DDR2-6400. 7 Pro SP1 x64 + XP Pro SP3 x86
DVB-S2: Cynergy S2 USB HD
2.)P4 3200 i865G (F-S Scenic W600pwr) XP Pro SP3
DVB-S: hauppauge WinTV Nexus-S rev. 2.2, driver TT 2.19h, hardware mode
19.2°,13°,28.x°E,30°W, DiSEqC 1.0
Auf Deutsch:
DVB-Cube <<< Das deutsche DVB-Forum >>>
Re: Scanning problems
#5Juergen, thanks. You are correct. But my point is that i´m havinq these problems about 3 or 2 past versions released. I have not noted this before.
I´m now scaning C band, but with strong Ku signals problem does not happen. Other thing noted, locking seems harder now, takes longer to occur. Let´s keep observing.
I´m now scaning C band, but with strong Ku signals problem does not happen. Other thing noted, locking seems harder now, takes longer to occur. Let´s keep observing.